Legal Opinion
Barchus v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided May 4, 2004No. 5:03-cv-00032PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HODGES, District Judge.
The Plaintiff, Judith Barchus, brings this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq., to recover for unpaid disability benefits she claims are due her as a participant or beneficiary of a long term disability plan provided by her employer, the Bombay Company, Inc., and administered by the Defendant, The Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company. The Plaintiff maintains she is entitled to long term benefits under the plan because two back injuries she sustained rendered her “totally disabled.” The…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Norma Rollins v. Techsouth, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- Fred Brown v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Olan Jett v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc., Medical Expense PlanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Featherston v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2004
- Wise v. Hartford Life and Accident Ins. Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2005
- Mattox v. Life Insurance Co. of North America ("Lina")District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2008
- Epolito v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2007
- Wilcox v. Standard InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.