Legal Opinion
Duplan Corp. v. Deering Milliken, Inc.
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided November 20, 1973No. Civ. A. Nos. 71-306, 70-968, 69-1096, 68-704, 69-777, 70-14, 70-189, 70-250, 70-295, 70-358, 70-385, 70-386, 70-391, 70-493, 70- 622, 70-628, 70-677, 70-683, 71-87 to 71-102, 71-115, 71-126, 71-127 and 71-283PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ON MOTION BY BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC., FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT THAT U.S. PATENT NO. 3,117,361 IS NOT INFRINGED BY USE OF ARCT FT MACHINES
HEMPHILL, District Judge.
Burlington Industries, Inc. (hereinafter called Burlington) moves the court for summary judgment that U. S. Patent No. 3,117,361 is not infringed by use of “false twist” (hereinafter designated FT) machines, manufactured by Ateliers Roannais de Constructions Textiles (hereinafter called ARCT-France) and sold by ARCT, Inc., of Greensboro, N.C., a U. S. subsidiary of ARCT-France. The motion is similar to, and a companion of,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Pierce v. Ford Motor Co. Mahone v. Ford Motor CoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
- Exhibit Supply Co. v. Ace Patents Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Coupe v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Oliver F. Marston v. J. C. Penney Company, Inc., Oliver F. Marston v. J. C. Penney Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- National Research Development Corp. v. Great Lakes Carbon Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1975
- Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1974
- Coal Processing Equipment, Inc. v. CampbellDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1981
- McGinley v. Luv N Care LtdDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2021