Legal Opinion
Van Vranken v. Atlantic Richfield Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 26, 1988No. C-79 0627 SWPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPENCER WILLIAMS, District Judge.
On April 4,1988, parties made cross-summary judgment motions on the issue of volumetric apportionment, known as the ‘V factor.” The parties also briefed the issue of whether any money sent to plaintiff class members from the Department of Energy pursuant to the Special Refund Proceeding HEF-0591 can be offset against any damages award. After oral argument, the court took the matters under submission. On June 1, 1988, this court filed its ruling which granted partial summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff class represented by Don Van Vranken and denied…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hrnjak v. Graymar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1971
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. Department of EnergyTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1979
- Peter Mamula and Dorothy R. Mamula v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. Department of EnergyTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1983
- Longview Refining Co. v. ShoreTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Department of EnergyTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1991
- Martin Oil Service, Inc. v. Koch Refining Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
- Van Vranken v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1989
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. U.S. Department of EnergyTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1992
- Sinclair Oil Corp. v. AbrahamCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.