Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. McMullin

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided April 2, 2010No. 08-P-1560PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Confrontation clause. The defendant argues that the admission of certified copies of records from the Registry of Motor Vehicles and the District Court violated his right to confront the witnesses against him under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The defendant acknowledges that the admissibility of such records is established by Commonwealth v. Maloney, 447 Mass. 577, 592 (2006), but observes that Maloney rested its analysis of the confrontation clause issue on Commonwealth v. Verde, 444 Mass. 279, 283-284 (2005), and that Verde has since been overturned by the United…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Commonwealth v. CurtisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  3. Commonwealth v. VerdeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  4. Commonwealth v. LopezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  5. Commonwealth v. SilvaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ParenteauMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  2. Commonwealth v. WeeksMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
  3. State v. JasperCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  4. Commonwealth v. RoyalMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2016
  5. State v. JasperCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API