United States v. Moreland
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND STATEMENT OF REASONS
JOSEPH R. GOODWIN, Chief Judge.
I. Background
In 2005, the Supreme Court determined that the mandatory Sentencing Guidelines regime violated the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial and remedied this violation by excising the two provisions of the Sentencing Reform Act that made the Guidelines mandatory, thus rendering them advisory. United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 232-36, 258-63, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). In the wake of Booker, this court and many other district courts struggled to understand the bounds of their newfound…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. CartyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. C.R.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- United States v. SternDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008
- United States v. NewhouseDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2013