Legal Opinion

United States v. Moreland

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided April 3, 2008No. 2:04-cv-00142PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND STATEMENT OF REASONS

JOSEPH R. GOODWIN, Chief Judge.

I. Background

In 2005, the Supreme Court determined that the mandatory Sentencing Guidelines regime violated the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial and remedied this violation by excising the two provisions of the Sentencing Reform Act that made the Guidelines mandatory, thus rendering them advisory. United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 232-36, 258-63, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). In the wake of Booker, this court and many other district courts struggled to understand the bounds of their newfound…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. United States v. CartyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. C.R.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
  2. United States v. SternDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008
  3. United States v. NewhouseDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API