Legal Opinion

Bono v. Secretary of Health & Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 30, 2009No. 02-1085VPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

MILLER, Judge.

Before the court, after argument on review of a decision dismissing a claim, is the issue whether the medical community’s recognition of a symptom, as related to a vaccine injury or illness, is a precondition to commence the limitations period under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-l-800aa-34 (2006) (the “Vaccine Act”). Not novel in the context of binding precedent, the issue is examined anew because the first symptoms of autism were not recognized as connected with the injury until long after the infant in this case…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. The Catawba Indian Tribe of South Carolina v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  2. Michael and Melissa Markovich, Parents of Ashlyn M. Markovich v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  3. Joseph Osler Brice and Laurajean Councill Brice, on Behalf of Their Son, Joseph Tilghman Brice v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  4. Goetz v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
  5. Markovich v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Carson v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API