Legal Opinion
Cardoza v. Millington
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 31, 1956No. Civ. 16753PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AGEE, J. pro tem. *
This is an action brought by John A. Cardoza to reform a “pre-incorporation agreement” between himself and his former partner, Geoffrey H. Millington, and to dissolve Stanford Sport Shop, Ine., a California corporation, which took over the partnership business. Hereafter, the plaintiff and respondent will be referred to as Cardoza and the defendants and appellants as Millington and the corporation.
Cardoza and Millington had been friends since 1927, when they lived next door to each other. In 1945, they formed a partnership to engage in the business of selling fishing,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Elliott v. Superior Court of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Tomas v. VaughnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Collins v. Consolidated Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
- Loney v. Consolidated Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
- Salinas National Bank v. CookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
3Cited by3 opinions
- Millington v. MillingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Chapin v. GrittonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Weisman v. OdellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970