Legal Opinion

Collins v. Consolidated Water Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 4, 1932No. Docket No. 8294PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

Plaintiff sued to compel the directors of the defendant corporation to dissolve the corporation and to distribute the assets among the stockholders. The individual defendants, together with the plaintiff, made up the entire list of stockholders. The corporation and those defendants constituting the board of directors (who also represented the majority of the stockholders) demurred by general and special demurrer. This demurrer was sustained and plaintiff declined to amend. Judgment went for the demurring defendants and plaintiff has appealed on a bill of exceptions.

The gravamen of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. La Société Française D'Epargnes et de Prévoyance Mutuelle v. Dist. Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Dist.California Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Westlake Park Investment Co. v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Lyon v. Carpenters' Hall Ass'n of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rayner v. RamirezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  2. Weisman v. OdellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Paramount Plastering, Inc. v. Local No. 2 of the Operative Plasterers & Cement Masons International Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1961
  4. Cardoza v. MillingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Kline Hawkes California SBIC, L.P. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API