Legal Opinion

State v. Hill

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 15, 1991No. CR 91-159PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The petitioner, State of Arkansas, requests a writ of certiorari on the basis that the trial court lacks the power to amend the charge of the Prosecuting Attorney of Faulkner County against the respondent, Jerry Hill, from theft of property (Ark. Code Ann. § 5-36-103 (1987) (a felony)) to theft of a trade secret (Ark. Code Ann. § 5-36-107 (1987) (a misdemeanor)).

The writ of certiorari is not one of right, but is to be granted or denied within the discretion of the court from which it is sought; certiorari may be granted where the court lacks the power to act as it has purported to do. Gran v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. EdmonsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Gran v. HaleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  3. Petition of United States of America for a Writ of MandamusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  4. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  5. State v. LauryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. MurphySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. State v. Vasquez-AerreolaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. State v. KnightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  4. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  5. State v. D.S.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API