Neese v. Radford

HENRY, Associate Justice.

— This suit was instituted by the appellant to recover damages alleged to have been occasioned by the unauthorized levy of an execution upon his interest in partnership property.

The appellee had recovered against the appellant, in the County Court, a judgment for money. Appellant perfected an appeal by executing a cost bond only. At a subsequent day, and before the expiration of twenty days from the date of the judgment, he filed a supersedeas bond. The levy was made, not by an actual seizure but by notice, upon the interest of the appellant in a saloon. The sheriff…