UCB, Inc. v. Yeda Research & Development Co.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LEONIE M. BRINKEMA, District Judge.
Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant UCB, Inc. (“UCB”) brought this declaratory judgment action seeking a declaration that its Cimzia® product, a humanized monoclonal antibody approved by the Food and Drug Administration- (“FDA”) for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic . arthritis, active ankylosing -spondylitis, and Crohn’s disease, does not infringe defendant’s patent and that the patent is invalid. Specifically, UCB argues that the defendant’s patent does not cover humanized .monoclonal antibodies like Cimzia®,…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- UCB, Inc. v. Yeda Research & Development Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Agilent Technologies, Inc. v. Axion Biosystems, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2025
- Maquet Cardiovascular LLC v. Abiomed Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2022
- Oralic Supplies Inc. v. HuangDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2024