Kerkman v. Hintz
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.
Dr. Max Hintz, D.C. appeals a judgment based on a jury verdict finding him liable for chiropractic malpractice. The principal issue on appeal concerns the appropriate standard of care by which to measure a chiropractor’s diagnosis, treatment or referral of a patient. Because we conclude that the trial court erroneously instructed the jury on a chiropractor’s standard of care, we reverse and remand for a new trial.
Dr. Hintz is a graduate of the Palmer College of Chiropractic in Davenport, Iowa. On September 13, 1982, Jerome Kerkman consulted Hintz with complaints of soreness in the upper…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Sanzari v. RosenfeldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Johnson v. Misericordia Community HospitalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- ROSENBERG BY ROSENBERG v. CahillSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. BoeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. GrawienCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kerkman v. HintzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
- Racine County v. Oracular Milwaukee, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009
- White v. LeederCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988
- Goldstein v. Janusz Chiropractic Clinics, S.C.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998