Legal Opinion

Kerkman v. Hintz

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided March 11, 1987No. 86-0215PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.

Dr. Max Hintz, D.C. appeals a judgment based on a jury verdict finding him liable for chiropractic malpractice. The principal issue on appeal concerns the appropriate standard of care by which to measure a chiropractor’s diagnosis, treatment or referral of a patient. Because we conclude that the trial court erroneously instructed the jury on a chiropractor’s standard of care, we reverse and remand for a new trial.

Dr. Hintz is a graduate of the Palmer College of Chiropractic in Davenport, Iowa. On September 13, 1982, Jerome Kerkman consulted Hintz with complaints of soreness in the upper…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Sanzari v. RosenfeldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  2. Johnson v. Misericordia Community HospitalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  3. ROSENBERG BY ROSENBERG v. CahillSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  4. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. BoeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. GrawienCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kerkman v. HintzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Racine County v. Oracular Milwaukee, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009
  3. White v. LeederCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988
  4. Goldstein v. Janusz Chiropractic Clinics, S.C.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API