Legal Opinion

Stockton v. . Lenoir

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 15, 1931PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStagy, C. J.

The facts aré fully set out in the first appeal as reported in 198 N. C., 148, 150 S. E., 886, to which reference may be had to avoid repetition.

We there held that, while the stipulation appearing on the face of each of the notes did not ipsissimis verbis provide for payment exclusively out of funds to be collected from corresponding note of the purchasers, . Almazov and Albert, yet, in view of the allegations of the answer, taken in connection with the stipulations appearing in the notes, it was open to tbe defendant to sbow by parol, .if be could, tbat sucb was tbe understanding of tbe…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Evans v. Freeman.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Typewriter Co. v. . Hardware Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. National Bank v. WinslowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Stockton v. . LenoirSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of FerrisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  2. Wilson v. AllsbrookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. Wilson v. . AllsbrookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. Meppen v. MeppenIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  5. In Re the Estate of BorkowskiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API