Legal Opinion
Rodriguez v. Ohio Department of Job & Family Services
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided January 12, 2006No. Nos. 86111 and 86134PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Colleen Conway Cooney, Presiding Judge.
{¶ 1} In this consolidated appeal, defendants-appellants, Director, Ohio Department of Job and Family Services (“ODJFS”) and General Motors (“GM”), appeal the trial court’s decision reversing the judgment of the Ohio Unemployment Compensation Review Commission. Finding merit to the appeal, we reverse the trial court’s decision.
{¶ 2} The parties stipulated to the procedural history and facts of this case. In 1998, employees at two GM facilities in Michigan went on strike. The strike caused a shortage of parts, and as a result, GM laid off employees,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Social Security Board v. NierotkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Irvine v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- Tzangas, Plakas & Mannos v. AdministratorOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Rini v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
- Futey v. Director, Odjfs, Unpublished Decision (10-6-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Geretz v. Dir., Ohio Department of Job & Family ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Geretz v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs.Ohio Supreme Court · 2006
- Rodriguez v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs.Ohio Supreme Court · 2006