Legal Opinion

In re Automatic Equipment Mfg. Co.

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided March 24, 1952No. B-3-50PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONOHOE, Chief Judge.

Fred L. Heese has filed in this corporate reorganization proceeding a claim including the sum of $2,517.60, for commissions. The trustees filed an objection to this claim on the ground that it is barred by the Statute of Limtations. R.R.S.Neb.1943, § 25-206. In view of Section 2, sub. a (2) of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 11, sub. a (2), applicable to corporate reorganizations under Chapter X by virtue of Section 102, 11 U.S.C.A. § 502, this Court has *428jurisdiction to consider and allow or disallow the claim objected to by the trustees. The matter was heard in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tayloe v. T. & S. SandifordSupreme Court of the United States · 1822
  2. F. M. Slagle & Co. v. BushnellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
  3. People ex rel. C. H. Little Co. v. GrantMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Fox v. CarmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1941

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re RhineDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1963
  2. Federal Land Bank Of St. Louis v. John WilsonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
  3. Federal Land Bank v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
  4. Rhine v. Valley Steel Products Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API