Legal Opinion

Wilshire Insurance v. Home Insurance

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 11, 1994No. 2 CA-CV 94-0190PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LACAGNINA, Judge.

The issues in this appeal from a declaratory judgment require us to examine more than one article of Chapter 7 of the Uniform Motor Vehicle Safety Responsibility Act (the Act), A.R.S. §§ 28-1101 to 28-1262, in order to decide the applicability of the permissive user coverage mandated by policies issued in compliance with § 28-1170 to policies issued in compliance with § 28-1233 and the amount of coverage provided when a policy exclusion violates the permissive user provisions of § 28-1170.

This action involves the coverage afforded by a business automobile policy issued…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. Mayflower Insurance ExchangeArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  2. State Ex Rel. Corbin v. PickrellArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Sandoval v. ChenowethArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Abbott v. City of TempeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  5. Mission Insurance v. Aid Insurance ServicesArizona Supreme Court · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McCandless v. United Southern Assurance Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  2. Mohave County v. Arizona Department of Water ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  3. Jenkins v. ShaullAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  4. Land O'Sun Realty Ltd. v. REWJB Gas InvestmentsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  5. Land O'Sun Realty Ltd. v. REWJB Gas InvestmentsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API