Legal Opinion

McCandless v. United Southern Assurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 3, 1997No. 1 CA-CV 96-0025, 1 CA-CV 96-0517PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SULT, Judge.

This consolidated appeal arises from two separate but related garnishment judgments entered for appellees David and Debra McCandless, as judgment-creditors, against appellant United Southern Assurance Company (“USAC”), as garnishee-defendant. In both proceedings, the trial court entered summary judgment, determining that USAC owed its policy limits towards satisfaction of underlying judgments McCandless had obtained against persons or entities purportedly insured by USAC.

BACKGROUND

The facts of this case are not disputed. In 1989, TWS Farms, Inc., a company based in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. KorzepArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. Garza RodriguezArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  3. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. LittleArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Hawkins v. State, Dept. of Economic SEC.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  5. State v. DeddensArizona Supreme Court · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. HensleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  2. Lavidas v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  3. State v. PatelCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  4. Thomas Luczak v. Corey a DrielickMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Benson v. Casa De Capri Enterprises LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API