Legal Opinion

Davis v. Los Alamos National Laboratory

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided March 30, 1989No. 10398, 10443PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ALARID, Judge.

Davis (claimant) appeals the compensation order of the Workers’ Compensation Division denying medical benefits for a hot tub installed in his home and awarding attorney fees. Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) and its insurance company (employer) cross-appeal that portion of the order finding they are not entitled to reimbursement from the Subsequent Injury Fund (the Fund). We reverse the award of attorney fees and affirm the compensation order of the division.

Claimant slipped and fell while at work on March 15, 1983. The resulting back pain was an aggravation of a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Woolwine v. Furr's, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Tallman v. ABF (Arkansas Best Freight)New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. H. T. Coker Construction Co. v. Whitfield Transportation, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Baca v. Bueno FoodsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Hales v. Van CleaveNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Camino Real Mobile Home Park Partnership v. WolfeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Martinez v. New Mexico State Engineer OfficeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Dick v. City of PortalesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Aragon v. Furr's, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Apodaca v. Payroll Express, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API