Legal Opinion
Beverly Hills National Bank v. Glynn
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 4, 1968No. Civ. 31638PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKingsley, J.
John D. Glynn, defendant below, a practicing attorney who appears in this court as his own counsel, has appealed from the judgment. The trial court held Glynn liable on two promissory notes of which he was found to be the maker, refusing to find that Glynn was in reality a surety, and on a continuing guaranty for a certain loan made to James B. O’Toole. The court refused to find Glynn liable under the same continuing guaranty for two other loans made by the same borrower (O’Toole) and the bank appeals from that portion of the court’s judgment denying recovery on two causes of action relating…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Gudelj v. GudeljCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- American Enterprise, Inc. v. Van WinkleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- American National Bank v. DonnellanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Sumitomo Bank of Cal. v. IwasakiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Automatic Vending Co. v. WisdomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Caito v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Leaf v. Phil Rauch, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1975
- Trollope v. JeffriesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Union Bank v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Beverly Hills National Bank v. GlynnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.