Legal Opinion

Rogers v. St. George

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided September 19, 1978No. Misc. Docket Nos. 78-01, 78-02PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT ON PETITIONS FOR EXTRAORDINARY RELIEF IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS

CEDARBURG, Chief Judge:

The above-styled Petitions were consolidated for oral argument and joint disposition because each involved identical issues and the same respondents.

On 4 January 1978, petitioner Rogers was convicted of various offenses by a special court-martial military judge and awarded a sentence which did not include a bad-conduct discharge. Similarly, on 22 December 1977, petitioner Moss had been convicted by a special court-martial military judge for various offenses and also was awarded a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McPhail v. United StatesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  2. Barnett v. PersonsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dew v. United StatesArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1998
  2. Holodinski v. McDowellU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API