Legal Opinion

Klamath Irrigation District v. Carlson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1945PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

The certificates of delinquency in suit are based upon unpaid irrigation district taxes for the years 1936, 1937 and 1938.

The major question here is whether alleged damages to defendant’s land by reason of negligent maintenance and operation of the irrigation system in suit will support defendant’s claim against plaintiff for affirmative relief by way of recoupment, set-off or counterclaim.

Defendant’s answer embraces the joining of the issues upon the allegations of plaintiff’s complaint and the affirmative allegations set forth in three further and separate answers. It must be borne in mind…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Malone v. El Paso County Water Improvement Dist. No. 1Court of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  2. Cabell v. Fed. Land Bank of SpokaneOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Livanis v. Northport Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
  4. First National Bank v. Benton CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Livanis v. Northport Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Foster v. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API