Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Source One Associates, Inc.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 21, 2002PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCowin, J.
After a jury-waived trial, a judge in the Superior Court found that the defendants, Source One Associates, Inc., add Peter Easton, since at least 1994 and through 1997,2 had committed knowing and wilful violations of G. L. c. 93A, by acting unfairly and deceptively in regularly selling personal confidential financial information that they obtained through surreptitious techniques. The trial judge further found that the defendants’ conduct had violated G. L. c. 93A at least 1,000 separate times, and imposed a civil penalty of $500,000, in addition to entering a permanent injunction enjoining…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- PMP Associates, Inc. v. Globe Newspaper Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Commonwealth v. HelfantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- Starr v. FordhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Commonwealth v. KingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Buster v. George W. Moore, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
- Remsburg v. Docusearch, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- Commonwealth v. LallyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
- Nissan Automobiles of Marlborough, Inc. v. GlickMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
- J.E. Pierce Apothecary, Inc. v. Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.