Legal Opinion

White v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 14, 1994No. 2521 C.D. 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOYLE, Judge.

This is an unusual appeal in a workers compensation case which presents an issue regarding the proper fee to be paid to a claimant’s first attorney where that attorney voluntarily withdraws his representation and is replaced by succeeding counsel, all with the complete approval of the claimant, the referee, and the claimant’s second attorney.

The essential underlying facts reveal that Carl Denny (Claimant) sustained a lower back injury while in the course of his employment on August 16, 1984 and, pursuant to a notice of compensation payable, began to receive temporary total…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wm. Penn Parking Garage, Inc. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Monnia's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Pitt v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Lengyel v. Frank Black, Jr., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hendricks v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Hendricks v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. In Re: Nom. Pet Michael Doyle Obj. of: SlossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API