Legal Opinion

Hendricks v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 16, 2006No. 237 C.D. 2006Published

1Opinion of the Court

909 A.2d 445 (2006)

Kevin HENDRICKS, Petitioner

v.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (PHOENIX PIPE & TUBE), Respondent.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued June 9, 2006.

Decided October 16, 2006.

Paul M. Silver, King of Prussia, for petitioner.

Adam Sager, Pottstown, for intervenor, Sager & Sager Associates.

No appearance entered on behalf of respondent.

BEFORE: COHN JUBELIRER, Judge, SIMPSON, Judge, and McCLOSKEY, Senior Judge.

OPINION BY Judge COHN JUBELIRER.

At issue in this case is whether a Workers' Compensation Judge (WCJ) and the Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Board) have the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Eugenie v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Sheridan v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Anzon, Inc.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Jonathan Sheppard Stables v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. General Machine Products Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Larry Pitt & Associates v. LongCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API