Legal Opinion

State v. Ford

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1995No. 62075-0PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*921Guy, J.

At issue is the precise scope of the right to plead guilty, which we have previously found to be established by court rule. State v. Martin, 94 Wn.2d 1, 614 P.2d 164 (1980). Mr. Ford argues the trial court’s decision not to accept his guilty plea violates the right to plead guilty under Martin. "We affirm the trial court.

The Defendant was charged by information on April 27, 1994, with three counts of first degree murder. At arraignment Mr. Ford, through his counsel, proffered a plea of guilty. The prosecutor immediately moved for a continuance of the arraignment, stating he possessed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. State v. TerrovonaWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Rice v. Dow Chemical Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. LuveneWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. McClendonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. McClendonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. LopezWashington Supreme Court · 2002

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API