Cheyenne Airport Board v. Rogers
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CARDINE, Justice.
The question here presented for our determination is whether the City of Cheyenne zoning ordinance providing a height limitation in a noninstrument approach zone to the Cheyenne municipal airport is unconstitutional. The appellees, Terry and Brenda Rogers, own residential property in the noninstrument approach zone. The Rogerses purchased this residential property in 1976, which was two years after passage of the ordinance. The particular height limit on their property, about 26 feet, has not affected the residential usage of the property. It does affect, however, a large…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Trinity Broadcasting of Denver, Inc. v. City of WestminsterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Saldana v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- City of Austin v. Travis County Landfill Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- Mack Phillips v. Montgomery County, TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
- White v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.