Legal Opinion

Torrington Co. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided October 3, 1996No. Consolidated Court No. 95-03-00350PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Tsoucalas, Judge:

Plaintiff and defendant-intervenor, The Torring-ton Company (“Torrington”), commenced this action challenging aspects of the Final Results of the fourth antidumping administrative review of the antidumping duty orders, entitled Antifriction Bearings (Other Than Tapered Roller Bearings) and Parts Thereof From France, et al. (“Final Results”), 60 Fed. Reg. 10,900 (1995), as amended, Anti-friction Bearings (Other Than Tapered Roller Bearings) and Parts Thereof From France (“Amended Final Results”), 60 Fed. Reg. 16,608 (1995). Defendant-intervenors and plaintiffs, SKF USA…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Torrington Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  4. Smith-Corona Group v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  5. Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
  2. Torrington Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
  3. Kolon Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
  4. Torrington Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API