In re Ferguson
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
After a bench trial, appellant Glenn Ferguson was found guilty of two counts of criminal contempt for violation of a civil protection order (“CPO”). On appeal, he argues that the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions. We agree that the evidence was insufficient as to one of the counts and reverse the conviction on that basis. We reverse the other conviction on the ground that the trial court erred in relying on a concession by defense counsel that was tantamount to a guilty plea, without assuring that appellant understood the consequences of that concession.
I
The record shows…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Earl Wayne Wiley v. Dewey Sowders, Superintendent, Kentucky State ReformatoryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Pinkney v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- Davis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Glenn v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Ba v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Denardo S. Hopkins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014