Legal Opinion
Ba v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided October 31, 2002No. 00-CM-1438PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REID, Associate Judge:
Appellant Alassane Ba was convicted of violating a civil protection order (“CPO”) under D.C.Code §§ 16-1004, -1005 (2001) at a bench trial. 1 On June 9, 2002, this court issued an opinion affirming Mr. Ba’s conviction. 2 Ba v. United States, 800 A.2d 692 (D.C.2002). Subsequently, after receiving petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc, the court vacated its opinion; granted rehearing; requested new briefing directed at the following issue: “Under the circumstances of appellant’s case, was consent a defense to the Civil Protection Order”; and scheduled the matter for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Maness v. MeyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cruz-Foster v. FosterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Bethard v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Brooks v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Davis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Shewarega v. YegzawDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Hector v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Williams v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Andre Holmon v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.