Denardo S. Hopkins v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GLICKMAN, Associate Judge:
In his opening statement at appellant Denardo Hopkins’s trial, defense counsel informed the jury that Hopkins was contesting only the firearms charges against him, not the drug distribution charges, which counsel conceded were true. This strategy was not unsuccessful — the jury convicted Hopkins of (unarmed) possession with intent to distribute (“PWID”) heroin and cocaine, but not of the other offenses — and Hopkins does not claim that his counsel was ineffective or acted against his wishes. Hopkins asks us to reverse his convictions, however, because the trial judge…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Florida v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Boyd v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- United States v. Howard D. BrownCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Paul K. StrotherCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re: Antonio CrawfordDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Richardson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024