Grosberg v. MICH. NAT'L BANK OAKLAND
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Plaintiff brought this action to recover the proceeds of a number of allegedly converted negotiable instruments. After a nonjury trial, the trial judge found no liability on the part of defendant. Plaintiff appeals by right.
Plaintiff was associated with Sheldon Goldman in the construction and operation of the Chatham Fox Hills Shopping Center. Goldman opened a joint checking account in his name and that of Grosberg at the bank by forging Grosberg’s signature on the relevant documents. Goldman made a deposit in the amount of $114,000 in negotiable instruments issued by tenants of the shopping…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dominion Construction, Inc. v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Szlinis v. Moulded Fiber Glass Companies, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1977
- Thurston v. Detroit Asphalt & Paving Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Leinert v. Sabine National BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Miller v. City Bank & Trust Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Holmes v. Kraus (In Re Kraus)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1984
- Grosberg v. Michigan National Bank OaklandMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Matco Tools Corp. v. Pontiac State BankDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1985