Legal Opinion

Ostman v. Eighth Judicial District Court

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1991No. 20924PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*564OPINION

2Per curiam

This petition for a writ of mandamus, or, in the alternative, a writ of prohibition, challenges an order of the district court denying petitioner’s pretrial petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner contends that the district court abused its discretion by not granting his pretrial petition brought on the grounds that the prosecutor violated her statutory duty to present exculpatory evidence to the grand jury. See NRS 172.145(2). We agree.

On October 13, 1989, an indictment was filed charging petitioner with ten counts of sexual assault and one count of coercion. NRS 200.366; NRS…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. GoldDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
  2. State v. BabayanNevada Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Kussman v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Sheriff, Clark County v. FrankNevada Supreme Court · 1987

4Cited by20 opinions

  1. Lay v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Rugamas v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Brown v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.Nevada Supreme Court · 2017
  4. CHASING HORSE (NATHAN) v. DIST. CT. (STATE)Nevada Supreme Court · 2024
  5. BROWN (WILLIS) VS. DIST. CT. (STATE)Nevada Supreme Court · 2017

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API