Legal Opinion

Rugamas v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of Clark

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 2013No. 62251PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Saitta, J.:

The State sought an indictment against petitioner Giovanni O. Rugamas on charges of sexual assault and lewdness involving a child who was under 10 years of age. During the grand jury proceedings, the State presented testimony about out-of-court statements made by the child-victim describing the alleged sexual conduct. With some exceptions, an out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted is “hearsay.” NRS 51.035. Under Nevada law, a grand jury cannot receive hearsay. NRS 172.135(2).

In this original writ proceeding, we consider whether…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Round Hill General Improvement District v. NewmanNevada Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. Eighth Judicial District Court ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Evans v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Braunstein v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Sheriff v. HodesNevada Supreme Court · 1980

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. CHASING HORSE (NATHAN) v. DIST. CT. (STATE)Nevada Supreme Court · 2024
  2. State of Alaska v. The Estate of Harry PowellAlaska Supreme Court · 2025
  3. Brown (David) v. Dist. Ct. (State)Nevada Supreme Court · 2014
  4. GATHRITE (DEANDRE) VS. DIST. CT. (STATE)Nevada Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Leavell (Ronald) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)Nevada Supreme Court · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API