Sheriff, Clark County v. Frank
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Respondent, Seth Frank, was charged by an indictment filed March 21, 1986, with one count of lewdness with a minor and once count of sexual assault on a child under the age of fourteen. See NRS 201.230; NRS 200.366(2)(c). Prior to trial, respondent challenged the indictment by way of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Among other contentions, he argued that the indictment was invalid because the district attorney (1) improperly withheld exculpatory evidence from the grand jury; and (2) allowed inadmissible testimony to be presented to the grand jury. The district court agreed and…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Johnson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- United States v. GoldDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
- Robertson v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1968
- Gibbons v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by19 opinions
- State v. CatanioNevada Supreme Court · 2004
- Lay v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. BabayanNevada Supreme Court · 1990
- Clem v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1988
- Lane v. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.