Legal Opinion

Sheriff, Clark County v. Frank

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1987No. 17671PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Respondent, Seth Frank, was charged by an indictment filed March 21, 1986, with one count of lewdness with a minor and once count of sexual assault on a child under the age of fourteen. See NRS 201.230; NRS 200.366(2)(c). Prior to trial, respondent challenged the indictment by way of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Among other contentions, he argued that the indictment was invalid because the district attorney (1) improperly withheld exculpatory evidence from the grand jury; and (2) allowed inadmissible testimony to be presented to the grand jury. The district court agreed and…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Johnson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. United States v. GoldDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
  4. Robertson v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Gibbons v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. CatanioNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Lay v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. BabayanNevada Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Clem v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Lane v. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API