United States v. Richard Bahr, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOODWIN, Senior Circuit Judge:
Defendant Richard Bahr, Jr. appeals the 240-month concurrent sentences he received after pleading guilty to two counts of possessing child pornography. Because the district court erroneously considered Bahr’s statements made during an earlier period of post-prison supervision, we vacate the sentence and remand.
I. BACKGROUND
In 2003, Bahr was convicted of third degree rape under Oregon state law. Upon his release to supervision, Bahr was required to complete an approved sex offender treatment program. The terms of his supervision required adherence to all…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. Lawrence Antelope, United States of America v. Lawrence AntelopeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Albert M. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- United States v. RamosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. Von BehrenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Andrew HulenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Juan LaraCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. GoodpasterDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2014
- Dansby Sr., Michael Edward v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.