Legal Opinion

Speybroeck v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1926No. 25,086PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGemmill, C. J.

The appellant and another were jointly charged by affidavit, in three counts, with violation of the Prohibition Law. The crimes charged were unlawful possession of a still, unlawful manufacture of intoxicating liquor, and maintaining a common nuisance. §§6, 4 and 24, Acts 1925 p. 144, §§2719, 2717 and 2740 Burns 1926. The appellant entered a plea of not guilty. He was tried separately by a jury and was found guilty on each count. His motion for a new trial was overruled and judgment was rendered on each of the three verdicts.

It is assigned as error that the court erred in overruling the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Remus v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923
  2. Goldberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1924
  3. Chicco v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1922
  4. Jones v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1924
  5. Earle v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Moran v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Peterson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Bays v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Butler v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Greer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1929

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API