Legal Opinion

Payne v. Mutual Savings Life Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 17, 2010No. 1090665PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WOODALL, Justice.

Bruce S. Payne appeals from a judgment on the pleadings in his action against Mutual Savings Life Insurance Company (“Mutual”) based on Mutual’s nonpayment of alleged policy benefits. We affirm.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

According to the undisputed facts, Payne purchased a “Cancer Plus Special Disease Policy” from Mutual in 1996 (“the policy”). Under its “schedule of specified benefits,” the policy listed the following two pertinent benefit provisions:

“RADIATION AND CHEMOTHERAPY BENEFIT: The usual and customary charge made by the Hospital or Doctor for radiotherapy…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Home Indem. Co. v. Reed Equipment Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  2. Universal Underwriters Ins. Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. B.K.W. Enterprises v. Tractor Equip. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  4. American Liberty Ins. Co. of Birmingham v. LeonardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  5. Behan v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Madison Cnty. v. Evanston Ins. Co.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API