Legal Opinion

Behan v. Friedman

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 8, 1928No. 6 Div. 111PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

This is a statutory bill to quiet title to the mineral interest in real estate.

Complainants and respondents claim through Charlotte Price, as a common source of title. Prior to 1SS3 she owned the absolute title. On November 20, 1883, she conveyed the mineral interest to- Musgrove Brothers by warranty deed. This deed was never recorded, however, until March 1st, 18S7.

Meantime, on January 17, 1887, Mrs. Price conveyed to Friedman & Loveman by warranty deed, an absolute title in fee simple, not excepting the mineral interest. Complainants claim through Friedman & Loveman and respondents through…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. Fadalla v. FadallaSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  2. Stewart v. ChildressSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  3. Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. PhiferSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  4. Hinds v. Federal Land Bank of New OrleansSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  5. Woods v. Allison Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1952

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API