Behan v. Friedman
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.
This is a statutory bill to quiet title to the mineral interest in real estate.
Complainants and respondents claim through Charlotte Price, as a common source of title. Prior to 1SS3 she owned the absolute title. On November 20, 1883, she conveyed the mineral interest to- Musgrove Brothers by warranty deed. This deed was never recorded, however, until March 1st, 18S7.
Meantime, on January 17, 1887, Mrs. Price conveyed to Friedman & Loveman by warranty deed, an absolute title in fee simple, not excepting the mineral interest. Complainants claim through Friedman & Loveman and respondents through…
2Cited by17 opinions
- Fadalla v. FadallaSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
- Stewart v. ChildressSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
- Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. PhiferSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Hinds v. Federal Land Bank of New OrleansSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Woods v. Allison Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1952
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.