Legal Opinion

United States v. M.P.M., Inc.

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided April 25, 1975No. Civ. A. C-3917PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

FINESILVER, District Judge.

The Government commenced this action pursuant to 15 U.S.C.A. § 25 (1948) [Clayton Act], challenging the acquisition by defendant M.P.M., Inc., [MPM] of two formerly independent ready-mix concrete firms, Mobile Conerete, Inc. [Mobile] and Pre-Mix Concrete, Inc. [Pre-Mix], and the subsequent corporate merger of the firms as violative of Section 7 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 18 (1950). The Government seeks divestiture of the acquisition and merger and injunctive relief to prevent defendants from acquiring similar companies in the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. United States v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Tampa Electric Co. v. Nashville Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Mandeville Island Farms, Inc. v. American Crystal Sugar Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
  2. In re A.H. Robins Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1985
  3. California v. Sutter Health SystemDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2001
  4. Monfort of Colorado, Inc. v. Cargill, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1983
  5. United States v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API