Legal Opinion
Searles v. Schulman
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 20, 2000No. AC 19075PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PELLEGRINO, J.
The plaintiff, Suzanne M. Searles, appeals from the trial court’s denial of her motion to open the judgment dismissing her complaint because *374of her failure to appear at a trial management conference. We affirm the order of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our resolution of this appeal. On April 24, 1995, the plaintiff, pro se, instituted the present action against the named defendant, Natalie Schulman, alleging an assault in a local grocery store. The complaint also named a codefendant who was a member of the West Hartford board…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Alix v. LeechConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Burke v. RuggerioConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Grunschlag v. Ethel Walker School, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Charbonneau v. CharbonneauConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Charbonneau v. CharbonneauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Worth v. KORTAConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Brehm v. BrehmConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Pospisil v. PospisilConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Moore v. FergusonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
- Stein v. HortonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.