Legal Opinion

Charbonneau v. Charbonneau

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 22, 1998No. AC 17885PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The sole issue in this appeal is whether the trial court improperly denied the defendant’s motion to open a judgment rendered after the defendant was defaulted for failing to appear. We conclude that it did not and affirm the judgment of the trial court.

On July 18, 1997, a default judgment was rendered in this marital dissolution action dissolving the marriage of the plaintiff and defendant, awarding $1 per year in alimony to the plaintiff and ordering the marital home transferred to the plaintiff by judicial decree. The trial *312court also issued a restraining order against the…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Walton v. Town of New HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  2. Altberg v. Paul Kovacs Tire Shop, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Misata v. Con-Way Transportation Services, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  2. Searles v. SchulmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  3. Charbonneau v. CharbonneauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  4. Brunswick School, Inc. v. HutterConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  5. Moore v. FergusonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API