Charbonneau v. Charbonneau
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The sole issue in this appeal is whether the trial court improperly denied the defendant’s motion to open a judgment rendered after the defendant was defaulted for failing to appear. We conclude that it did not and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
On July 18, 1997, a default judgment was rendered in this marital dissolution action dissolving the marriage of the plaintiff and defendant, awarding $1 per year in alimony to the plaintiff and ordering the marital home transferred to the plaintiff by judicial decree. The trial *312court also issued a restraining order against the…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Walton v. Town of New HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Altberg v. Paul Kovacs Tire Shop, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
4Cited by5 opinions
- Misata v. Con-Way Transportation Services, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Searles v. SchulmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Charbonneau v. CharbonneauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Brunswick School, Inc. v. HutterConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Moore v. FergusonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025