Hoke v. Simonton
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.
This suit was brought by appellee, a former tax collector of Montgomery county, against I. D. Hoke, his successor, who duly qualified as such in 1924, again in 1926, and again in 1928, and the sureties upon each of Hoke’s official bonds for his three several terms of office. The purpose of the suit was to recover fees of office earned by Simonton while he was. in office, but collected by Hoke, as his successor. The suit was for $1,184, but on trial to the court without a jury the judgment was for only $668.43, with liability for this sum correctly distributed among the sureties for his three…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Skipwith v. HurtTexas Supreme Court · 1901
- Humble Pipe Line Co. v. KincaidCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Love v. KeowneTexas Supreme Court · 1882
- Linz v. Eastland CountyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
- Jeff Davis County v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hatcher v. State of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1935
- Medford v. Red River CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- McNeal v. SteinbergerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Gilbert v. MooringCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Trapp v. LamptonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.