Legal Opinion

Wallace v. Carlin

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 18, 1928No. Docket No. 5376PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD (W. J.), J., pro tem.

Plaintiff seeks to recover a sum alleged to have been earned as a salesman for defend ant. At the close of plaintiff’s testimony defendant presented a motion for nonsuit, which was taken under advisement and on a later date, December 18, 1925, granted by the court. An entry of the order granting the motion was made upon the minutes of the court. On January 5, 1926, a judgment was signed by the trial judge and caused to be filed, in which the following appears: “Whereupon, upon motion of said counsel, said court take said motion under advisement, and thereafter and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nunez v. DautelSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Williston v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Randall v. JohnsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Sears v. WrightSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1844
  5. Greenstreet v. CheatumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Weaver v. GrunbaumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  2. Bartholomae Oil Corp. v. Oregon Oil & Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Peterson v. Montgomery Holding Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Nikolaus v. HoweCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Gelfan v. Bessolo & Gualano, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API