Legal Opinion
Roberts v. Dimension Aviation
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided May 24, 2004No. CIV 00-2041PHXJATPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
TEILBORG, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs claims that he was discriminated against by Defendant because of his alleged learning and vision disabilities (Doc. # 52). Plaintiff opposed the motion (Doc. # 58) and Defendant replied. 1 Summary judgment is appropriate when “the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to summary…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Fraser v. GoodaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Morgan v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013
- CAGNETTI v. JUNIPER VILLAGE AT BENSALEM OPERATIONSDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- Fitzgerald v. Freightliner of Arizona LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2019
- Latham v. ActonDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2020
- Lindsay Kahle v. Lilo Enterprises IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2026