Legal Opinion
Latham v. Acton
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided October 9, 2020No. 3:19-cv-00258Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA BEN LATHAM, Plaintiff, v. JAMIE ACTON, et al., Case No. 3:19-cv-00258-SLG Defendants. ORDER RE MOTION TO DISMISS Before the Court at Docket 31 is Defendants Municipality of Anchorage (“MOA”), Jamie Acton, Will Brown, and Sandy James’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff Ben Latham filed an opposition at Docket 41. Defendants replied at Docket 50. Mr. Latham requested oral argument, however, the Court found that it was not necessary to the Court’s determination and denied Mr. Latham’s request.1 BACKGROUND Mr.…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.