Legal Opinion

Maloy v. Holl

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 10, 1906PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSheldon, J.

This case comes before us on the report of a judge of the Superior Court upon the bill, answer and statement of agreed facts.

It appears that on the twenty-third day of April, 1897, the defendant Holl, who is hereinafter called the defendant, conveyed to the plaintiff land in the vicinity of Columbus Avenue in Boston, by quitclaim deed of that date, containing a covenant that it was free from all incumbrances made or suffered by her. The plaintiff contends that on that day the land was subject to a betterment assessment under an order of the street commissioners of the city of Boston, passed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Carr v. DooleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  2. Jones v. Board of AldermenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  3. Blackie v. HudsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  4. Warren v. Street CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  5. Prince v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Engel v. ThompsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
  2. Morse v. Street CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  3. George A. Lowe Co. v. Simmons Warehouse Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Smith v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  5. Campbell v. HavenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API