Legal Opinion

Dunavin v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 28, 1981No. 65731PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CLINTON, Judge.

In this probation revocation case the first ground of error is that a signed order revoking probation is not in the record. However, we have found one purportedly signed by the judge of the trial court and certified by the clerk of the court to be a true and correct copy of the order that appears of record in the stated volume and at the given page in the Criminal Minutes of the trial court. In pertinent part the order reads:

“The Court having heard and considered said motion [to revoke probation] and the evidence submitted, it appears ... that said defendant has violated…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Flournoy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  2. Tamez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  3. Drago v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Roberts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  5. Coronado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Gibson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  2. Ortiz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1996
  3. Bollinger v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2007
  4. Borgen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  5. Harris v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API