Legal Opinion
Petrilli v. Gow
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided February 12, 1997No. Civil 3:95CV1657(PCD)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS
DORSEY, Chief Judge.
Defendants move pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) to dismiss the amended complaint with respect to stock purchases which occurred more than six years prior to commencement of this action. For the reasons below, the motion is denied. Third party defendants move pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) to dismiss the third party complaint. For the reasons below, the motions are granted in part, denied in part.
I. BACKGROUND
The following allegations are accepted as true. Plaintiffs Petrilli and Raimann-Rose are former employees of defendant USGI, Inc.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Losquadro v. FGH Realty Credit Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1997
- Daniels v. BurseyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004
- Tourangeau v. Uniroyal, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1999
- BOARD OF TRUSTEES, OF THE UAW GROUP HEALTH & WELFARE PLAN v. ACOSTADistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
- Remy v. Lubbock National BankDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2019