Legal Opinion

W. Willard Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. The Floridice Company, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 21, 1967No. 21798_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TUTTLE, Chief Judge:

The Secretary of Labor brought suit under the Fair Labor Standards Act (29 U.S.C.A. Sec. 201 et seq.) to restrain The Floridice Company, its principal officers, and others, 1 from violating certain of the Act’s provisions, and to compel Floridice to pay, for the benefit of vari ous of its employees, certain amounts alleged to be due as unpaid minimum wages and overtime compensation.

The case was tried to the court without a jury, and the sole issue considered by the district judge was whether Floridice is an establishment “seventy-five pereentum of whose annual volume of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Idaho Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v. WirtzSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. City Ice Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. George P. Schultz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Instant Handling, Inc., and Joseph E. King, IndividuallyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Crotty Brothers Dallas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  3. Luck Stone Corp. v. Loudoun CountyLoudoun County Circuit Court · 1992
  4. Fairfax County v. DataComp Corp.Fairfax County Circuit Court · 1995
  5. TISOFT, Inc. v. Fairfax CountyFairfax County Circuit Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API