United States v. Ingrel E. Ortega-Gal
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
POSNER, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal from a 41-month sentence for entering the United States without authorization after having been removed, 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), we consider whether and when a district judge can reduce a defendant’s sentence upon discovering an error in an earlier conviction of the defendant, a conviction that if left undisturbed would support the higher sentence.
Several of the circuits, relying on Custis v. United States, 511 U.S. 485, 114 S.Ct. 1732, 128 L.Ed.2d 517 (1994), have held that the judge may not do that, at least (a potentially critical qualification, as we’ll…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Custis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Pepper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- United States v. MunnCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Francisco CastilloCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Christian Alvarado-MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Baca-BacaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Lozaro CorralCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Mauricio Gonzalez-LaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012